Receipts the organizational-independence claim a parametric trigger's neutrality depends on: that the entity whose kernel computed a specific trigger execution (an art-251 payout, an art-252 cat-bond term validation, or an art-309 index derivation) declares no controlling or compensating relationship with a named interested party (cedant, sponsor, reinsurer, or other) to the outcome that trigger determines. This is a self-declared attestation: it receipts what was declared, not an independently verified fact.
The demo values below are synthetic and already loaded, so you can press Run without entering anything of your own.
It does not verify the declared calc-agent identity against any corporate registry, sanctions list, or ownership database, and it does not itself determine whether a trigger computation was actually independent. It is not a legal or regulatory finding. A clean "independence asserted" result is a record of the declaration made, over one specific trigger execution_hash, nothing more.
ART-306 scores whether an AI agent's execution evidence is complete enough for an underwriter to price it, a rubric composite across determinism, replayability, oversight density, and dispute history. This node asks a different question: not how good is the evidence, but whether the entity that computed this specific trigger outcome is free of a declared controlling or compensating relationship with a named party to that outcome. This node produces no composite and no rubric, only a binary declared-relationship attestation bound to one trigger execution_hash. Cite this node's execution_hash, independence_asserted, and trigger_ref fields when composing a dispute-ready evidence pack over the same trigger computation.