Eleven browser-based tools for T+1 settlement readiness and CSDR compliance: operational workflow timing, settlement efficiency benchmarking, securities lending recall modelling, buy-in cost analysis, non-DVP retail fund migration, CSDR cash penalty calculation, CRR3 capital impact, settlement finality, DvP reconciliation, and FX settlement risk. All client-side. Zero PII.
Assess operational readiness for the UK T+1 securities settlement transition (October 11, 2027). Score affirmation cycle compression, FX funding, securities lending recall, fails management, and CSD connectivity across 5 domains.
Open tool →Score each post-trade step against UK AST T+1 timing requirements. Allocation by 23:00 T+0, confirmation by 23:59, settlement instruction by 08:00 T+1. Flags chain breaks and generates remediation priorities.
Open tool →Calculate your Settlement Efficiency Rate by fail cause, benchmark against the AST ≥98% target, and model the improvement trajectory to the Jul–Sep 2027 measurement window.
Open tool →Model revenue impact of shortening recall periods under T+1. Calculates tenor compression losses, CSDR penalty savings, net P&L impact, and optimal tenor rebalancing strategy.
Open tool →Audit settlement finality provisions under the EU Settlement Finality Directive (SFD). Map designated system status, irrevocability cut-offs, and netting arrangements.
Open tool →Reconcile delivery-versus-payment settlement across custodians and CSDs. Identify fails, matched/unmatched trades, and cash/securities mismatches.
Open tool →Assess FX settlement fails risk across currency corridors. Model fails rates, PvP exposure, and CLS membership impact. CSDR and FX Global Code compliance checks.
Open tool →Calculate daily and cumulative cash penalties under CSDR/CSDR Refit. Penalty rates by instrument type (liquid equity 1bp, sovereign 0.1bp). Buy-in trigger detection and break-even analysis vs bid-offer spread.
Open tool →Classify instrument into CSDR mandatory buy-in scope, calculate the trigger day (4/7/15 business days by type), and compare buy-in execution cost against cumulative penalty to produce a buy-in-or-pay recommendation.
Open tool →BACS (3-day lag) is incompatible with T+1. Score BACS/FPS/CHAPS rail mix, model annual cost uplift of migrating retail flows, flag FPS £1M ceiling breaches, and output a phased migration plan.
Open tool →Model the CRR3 output floor phase-in impact from 50% (2025) to 72.5% (2030). Year-by-year additional CET1 requirements, pro-forma CET1 ratios, and cost of capital drag. For EU IRB-model banks.
Open tool →