OpenChainGraph Suite · ART-510 · Securitisation · Investor Due Diligence

Article 5 Due Diligence Evidence Record

Records, for one position over one period, which Article 5 verification and ongoing monitoring duties you performed, the evidence behind each, what is still outstanding, and who signed each off. Gaps come back as a named list with the duty against each one, never as a percentage. Takes the recomputation from ART-509 as the evidence behind the ongoing monitoring duty.

Pinned citations, full dates only Named gap list, no ratio Signed sign-off required No disclosure template read

Duty set: the duties stated in Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402, as amended by Regulation (EU) 2021/557 · primary legislation, not a maintained template · not exhaustive · field set v1.0.0

🔒 All inputs are processed locally in your browser. No data is transmitted. Do not enter real personal data — use synthetic or anonymised inputs only.

⚠ Every status here is evidence of a human act. Nothing on this page says that the diligence you performed was adequate, that a duty was discharged to any supervisor satisfaction, or that any authority has accepted anything. This is not a filing and it does not discharge Article 5. Use opaque position, deal and identity references and evidence references rather than evidence content: no loan level or personal data is needed, and fields this page does not map are ignored and never appear in the receipt. It computes once when you press the button, stores nothing, runs on no schedule, and retains nothing.

Position and period

The demo record below is synthetic and already loaded, so you can press Run without entering anything of your own.

Position reference

Deal reference

Investor reference

Period label

Period start (ISO yyyy-mm-dd, your input, never a clock read)

Period end (ISO yyyy-mm-dd)

Duty declarations

JSON array: duty_id, performed, evidence[], optional judgment_required naming what is undetermined and who decides, optional citation override with a full ISO in_force_from

Sign-off records

JSON array: duty_id, role of performer or approver, record_type, identity, and the proof binding the record to that identity

[
  { "duty_id": "verify_risk_retention", "role": "performer", "record_type": "approval", "identity": { "id": "did:example:analyst-a", "actor_type": "human" }, "audit_signature": { "proof": { "cryptosuite": "eddsa-jcs-2022", "verificationMethod": "did:example:analyst-a#key-1" } } },
  { "duty_id": "verify_risk_retention", "role": "approver", "record_type": "approval", "identity": { "id": "did:example:officer-b", "actor_type": "human" }, "audit_signature": { "proof": { "cryptosuite": "eddsa-jcs-2022", "verificationMethod": "did:example:officer-b#key-1" } } },
  { "duty_id": "monitor_ongoing_performance", "role": "performer", "record_type": "approval", "identity": { "id": "did:example:analyst-a", "actor_type": "human" }, "audit_signature": { "proof": { "cryptosuite": "eddsa-jcs-2022", "verificationMethod": "did:example:analyst-a#key-1" } } },
  { "duty_id": "monitor_ongoing_performance", "role": "approver", "record_type": "approval", "identity": { "id": "did:example:agent-1", "actor_type": "agent" }, "audit_signature": { "proof": { "cryptosuite": "eddsa-jcs-2022", "verificationMethod": "did:example:agent-1#key-1" } } }
]

Duties

Outstanding, by duty

Open questions

Sign-off findings

Rejected citations

Rationale

Execution Hash (SHA-256)

What this does not do

It performs none of the duties for you and recomputes none of the underlying arithmetic. It publishes no coverage ratio, no percentage of duties met and no score, because a proportion invites a reader to treat a partial record as partial compliance: what you get instead is a list naming each outstanding duty and what is missing against it. It reads no disclosure template and checks no field set. Where a duty concerns Article 7 information, what is recorded is that the information was obtained, never an assessment of a template. The duty set shipped here is the Article 5 paragraph set, which is primary legislation rather than a maintained table, and it is not offered as an exhaustive statement of everything you must do: declare further duties with their own pinned citations where your own analysis calls for them.

Consumes ART-509 Securitisation Payment Waterfall Recomputation, whose output is the evidence behind the ongoing monitoring duty. See also ART-447 Securitisation Risk Retention Check.