Score Direct vs Sponsored (done-with) vs Sponsored / Agent (done-away) FICC access across cost, execution-access, margin/netting efficiency, and ops. Emits a hash-anchored OpenChainGraph v0.4 artifact.
| Access model | Annual cost | Est. IM | Blended score | Eligible |
|---|
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this exact tool, with this sample, and verify the artifact.
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `model_clearing_access_economics`. Task: Select and costs the FICC access model - Direct vs Sponsored (done-with) vs Sponsored/Agent (done-away) - across cost, execution-access, margin/netting efficiency, and ops.
Call it with arguments: {"policy_parameters":{}}
Verify before trusting: call `verify_execution_hash` on mcp.ainumbers.co (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with the parameter `claimed_hash` set to the returned `execution_hash`, passing the full artifact the run returned (the object containing `policy_parameters` + `output_payload` + `execution_hash`; equivalently `policy_parameters` + `output_payload` with `claimed_hash`), not the bare hash string.
Return the ledger link https://ledger.ainumbers.co/ so a human can re-verify without contacting us.
PII rule: All inputs are processed locally in your browser. No data is transmitted. Do not enter real personal data — use synthetic or anonymised inputs only.
Open the tool with the sample prefilled: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/art-49-clearing-access-model-selector.html#p=v1.H4sIAAAAAAAA_wECAP3_e31Dv6ajAgAAAA