Model the cost savings of migrating a payment flow to Tempo vs incumbent rails — card (Visa/Mastercard), SWIFT wire, ACH, or SEPA. Input your flow profile, monthly volume, and average transaction amount to receive a CFO-ready savings memo with per-transaction savings, basis points, annual savings, and break-even analysis. ISO 20022 pacs.008 artifact output. Client-side. Zero PII.
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this exact tool, with this sample, and verify the artifact.
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `model_tempo_payment_economics`. Task: Model cost savings from migrating a payment flow to Tempo vs incumbent rails (card, SWIFT, ACH, SEPA).
Call it with arguments: {"policy_parameters":{"rail":"swift","stablecoin":"usdc","tx_amount_usd":10000,"monthly_volume":500,"impl_months":3}}
Verify before trusting: call `verify_execution_hash` on mcp.ainumbers.co (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with the parameter `claimed_hash` set to the returned `execution_hash`, passing the full artifact the run returned (the object containing `policy_parameters` + `output_payload` + `execution_hash`; equivalently `policy_parameters` + `output_payload` with `claimed_hash`), not the bare hash string.
Return the ledger link https://ledger.ainumbers.co/ so a human can re-verify without contacting us.
PII rule: All inputs are processed locally in your browser. No data is transmitted. Do not enter real personal data — use synthetic or anonymised inputs only.
Open the tool with the sample prefilled: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/art-35-tempo-payments-business-case.html#p=v1.H4sIAAAAAAAA_wFfAKD_eyJyYWlsIjoic3dpZnQiLCJzdGFibGVjb2luIjoidXNkYyIsInR4X2Ftb3VudF91c2QiOjEwMDAwLCJtb250aGx5X3ZvbHVtZSI6NTAwLCJpbXBsX21vbnRocyI6M31rj8M0XwAAAA