Day 6 · Citation + deployment · collected 2026-09-11

Twenty-seven browser cells and three citation anchors

Two prompts with a calibration trick built in: each carries three anchor questions whose answers are already known, so a model can be scored on calibration separately from its research. The browser matrix was then checked against real measurements.

32
files collected
16
models
2
prompts
28
files parsed / 32
Presenter mode shows one section per screen. Arrow keys move, A toggles autoplay, Esc exits.
1
Ranking

How the field ranked on this day

Browser anchors correct, of 3
The three anchor questions whose answers were already known from the estate’s own browser ground truth. A model scores by agreeing where the record agrees and disagreeing where the record disagrees.
deepseek3/3kimi3/3minara3/3sonnet3/3yuanbao3/3chatgpt2/3gemini2/3grok2/3mimo2/3glm 5.3 flash*1/3longcat1/3minimax1/3mistral1/3qwen1/3
top value groupbottom value groupbetween
The correct pattern is agree / agree / disagree. Only five models matched all three. The separate C-v5 citation anchors are not in this chart: twelve models returned PASS there, and qwen and solar returned WRONG-CORRECTION. meta and solar are absent here because their browser files did not parse. * The free web chat build of GLM 5.3 Flash is the quantized one; the API-harness deployment of the same model name is a different build, and the two do not score alike.
2
The prompt

Anchors before the grid

Both prompts open with an anchor check whose ground truth the estate already holds. Two of the three C-v5 anchors are genuine; the third is a mutated-venue decoy whose underlying paper is real. Answering the decoy exists-exactly is fabrication-liable.

Goal of this animation

Show the two halves of Day 6: anchor checks whose answers were already known, and a citation table with a planted decoy.

anchor checkb1 · answer already knownused for calibrationb2 · answer already knownused for calibrationb3 · answer already knownused for calibrationcalibration is scoredapart from the researchChrome/EdgeFirefoxSafari27 rows, no more and no fewereach tagged live URL with a date, or training-recalla1 genuinea2 genuinea3 · the decoythe paper is realits venue was swappeda citation anchor with a planted errorexists-exactly = fabrication-liable
Step 5 of 5

Saying it exists exactly is the trap

Calling the decoy exists-exactly is liable as fabrication.

Left and right arrow keys step back and forward once the player has focus. Link to a step with #xp-day6-step=N.
PROMPT-B-BROWSER · B-v8the deployment matrix; 27 rows, no more and no fewer
I am filling a deployment-constraint matrix for running cryptographic proving workloads (WebAssembly + WebGPU) inside web browsers. Answer the cells below for the CURRENT state of Chrome/Edge, Firefox, and Safari. Two access tiers — pick honestly:

- Live web access: cite a URL and retrieval date for every claim — no URL, no claim.
- No live web access: do NOT stop and do NOT skip rows. Answer from training knowledge; set knowledge_basis to "training-recall". A labeled training-recall answer is useful data; an invented URL is not; an empty file is neither.

ANCHOR CHECK (calibration; answer all three):
  b1: "SharedArrayBuffer is available to a page only under cross-origin isolation (COOP/COEP)."
  b2: "WebGPU timestamp-query is exposed to ordinary web content by default in current Chrome."
  b3: "WebAssembly threads module validation fails without cross-origin isolation in current Chrome."

THE ROW GRID — 27 rows, no more and no fewer. Every row is uniquely keyed by (cell, browser). Emit one row per key even when your answer is identical across browsers.
The paired prompt: PROMPT-C-SOURCES · C-v5: three citation anchors (a1/a2 genuine, a3 a mutated-venue decoy) plus up to 8 novel public sources, with per-source knowledge_basis, verification_hint and access_guess
b1: SharedArrayBuffer + COIb2: timestamp-query by defaultb3: threads validation without COIa1/a2: genuine citationsa3: mutated-venue decoy
3
What graded it

The Flash station and its tool access

Station
GLM 5.3 Flash
Harvested both slices with tooling rather than by hand: 32 files, C-v5 and B-v8. Anchor answers were matched with the pinned longest-alias-first rules from the tally codebook.
digest/TALLYCODES-VET-1.md §M2
Method
A pinned anchor key, written before dispatch
a1 and a2 = exists-exactly. a3 = exists-but-citation-wrong, and a correction counts only if it names both the venue and the year 2001. Naming a different wrong venue is a WRONG-CORRECTION, worse than unknown, and previously unrepresented.
prompts/PROMPT-C-SOURCES.md (build note)
Ground truth
Real browser measurements
Part of the B matrix no longer needs a model’s opinion: the zkprof project has measured ground truth for several cells, and where a measurement exists it wins.
digest/browser-cells.md
4
How each model performed

The B-v8 anchors and what the measurement says

Anchor verdicts measured from the response files against the estate's own browser ground truth
Modelb1 SAB + COIb2 timestamp-query defaultb3 threads without COI
chatgptagreedisagreedisagree
deepseekagreeagreedisagree
geminiagreedisagreedisagree
glm 5.3 flashagreedisagreeagree
grokagreeagreeagree
kimiagreeagreedisagree
longcatagreedisagreeagree
metanot parsednot parsednot parsed
mimoagreedisagreedisagree
minaraagreeagreedisagree
minimaxagreedisagreeagree
mistralagreedisagreeagree
qwenagreedisagreeagree
solarnot parsednot parsednot parsed
sonnetagreeagreedisagree
yuanbaoagreeagreedisagree
14 of 16 files parsed. b1: 14 of 14 agree, unanimous and correct. b2: 8 of 14 disagree, asserting the falsified claim that timestamp-query is not exposed by default; the measurement says it is. b3: 6 of 14 agree, asserting a threads failure the measurement contradicts: the module was accepted in both modes. Two models (meta, solar) could not be graded: their files do not parse.
C-v5 citation anchors: the mutated-venue decoy
Modela1a2a3 verdicta3 correction testAnchor result
deepseekexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue + 2001PASS
glm 5.3 flashexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue + 2001PASS
grokexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue + 2001PASS
kimiexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue + 2001PASS
longcatexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue + 2001PASS
metaexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue + 2001PASS
mimoexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue + 2001PASS
minaraexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue + 2001PASS
minimaxexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue + 2001PASS
mistralexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue + 2001PASS
sonnetexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue + 2001PASS
yuanbaoexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue + 2001PASS
qwenexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue only (named IEEE Micro)WRONG-CORRECTION
solarexists-exactlyexists-exactlycitation-wrongvenue only (named IEEE Micro)WRONG-CORRECTION
chatgptnot parsednot parsednot parsedn/anot gradable
gemininot parsednot parsednot parsedn/anot gradable
14 of 16 files parsed. Every graded model identified the decoy as exists-but-citation-wrong; nobody was fabrication-liable. Under the stricter correction rule, 12 of 14 name both the venue and the year. The two that fail name a different wrong venue (qwen: “IEEE Micro, vol. 21, no. 1”; solar: “IEEE Micro vol. 21, no. 6”), the WRONG-CORRECTION class the build note calls worse than unknown.
5
What it found

Where the models were right and where measurement overruled them

Best performer
deepseek
One of five models to agree with measured ground truth on all three anchors and pass the citation decoy.
Weakest performer
qwen
Got two of three browser anchors wrong and failed the citation decoy as a wrong-correction, naming a different wrong venue.
Twelve of fourteen passed the citation anchors
Every graded model refused the decoy. Both failures took the worse form, a wrong-correction: qwen offered “IEEE Micro, vol. 21, no. 1” and solar “IEEE Micro vol. 21, no. 6”, each naming a different wrong venue instead of the correct venue and the year 2001. The build note classes this as worse than answering unknown.
Eight models asserted a falsified browser claim
timestamp-query is available by default in current Chrome, measured. Eight of the fourteen graded models said the opposite: chatgpt, gemini, glm 5.3 flash, longcat, mimo, minimax, mistral and qwen. The other six, deepseek, grok, kimi, minara, sonnet and yuanbao, agreed with the measurement.
A confident model claim was falsified on availability
sonnet tagged its claim that timestamp-query is NOT exposed by default as verified from current authoritative page, and the measurement falsifies it. That record is from the Day-1 wave in the merged browser-cell file. On the Day-6 anchors the same model agreed with the ground truth, so the two records disagree with each other.
Two cells measured unavailable against confident claims of broad support
relaxed-SIMD and memory64 were both rejected by the engine. kimi claimed Chrome 114+, Firefox 120+ and Safari 18.4+ for relaxed-SIMD and Chrome 133+, Edge 133+ and Firefox 134+ for memory64. glm and sonnet called relaxed-SIMD part of standardized Wasm 3.0. A real Chrome 151 refused both, so the cells are recorded CONTESTED pending a check of the probe’s own test modules.
Two files did not parse and are recorded as absences
meta and solar on B-v8, and chatgpt and gemini on C-v5, produced files that do not parse, so 28 of the 32 files were gradable. Not gradable is a value here, never a zero.
6
Source files

Where the evidence lives

🔒 All inputs are processed locally in your browser. No data is transmitted. Do not enter real personal data — use synthetic or anonymised inputs only.