The complete enterprise DLT onboarding suite: purpose-built tools covering CBDC architecture selection, smart contract validation, DvP reconciliation, settlement finality auditing, privacy topology design, node modelling, stablecoin reserve stress testing, and tokenized asset compliance. One unified workflow for every permissioned chain deployment. All in the browser. All client-side. Zero PII.
The DTCC Tokenization Service (DTS) went live on October 28, 2026. DTC, a DTCC subsidiary, mints tokenized representations of securities held at DTC, and eligible DTC Participants can convert entitlements between book-entry and tokenized form. Every fact below is cited to DTCC's own pages: see the go-live press release, the DTS service page, and the DTS FAQ hub.
Canton Network, using the CIP-56 token standard, and Besu, DTCC's private network, using ERC-20. DTCC anticipates Stellar (SEP-41) and Arc from Circle (ERC-20) in 2027, with additional L1s and L2s to follow.
Russell 1000 constituents, exchange-traded funds tracking major indices, and U.S. Treasury securities, with a select subset available at launch based on Participant demand. DTCC counts 34 securities available to tokenize at launch.
A three-year authorization period under the SEC no-action letter issued to DTC in December 2025.
20 DTC Participants have signed agreements to date. Conversion orders run from 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. During those DTC processing hours, tokens may move between the two networks via burn-and-mint, without relying on unsupported bridge protocols. Corporate-action distributions are paid out in fiat, not on-chain, and DTS is a free-of-value service.
Estate tools that model these workflows: Canton Tokenization Readiness Diagnostic (T503), Tokenized Collateral Eligibility Checker (T505), Canton DvP Atomicity Validator (T507), Tokenized Security Lifecycle Validator (T512), Margin Call Collateral Mobilizer (T513), Tokenized Fund Collateral Validator (T514), and the DTC-Custodied Tokenized U.S. Treasury Issuance & DvP validator (art-109).
Follow the five-stage developer onboarding path below or jump directly to any tool. All tools run in your browser: no account, no data transmission.
Automated: ▶ Run the CBDC & DLT Architecture Composer: chains architecture comparison, ISO 20022 mapping, interoperability modeling, platform comparison, and a decision lab into a single guided session.
Automated: ▶ Run the DLT Network Governance & Design Composer: chains privacy selection, node topology modeling, guardrail building, and a readiness checklist into a single guided session.
Automated: ▶ Run the DLT Tokenised Settlement Compliance Composer: chains DvP reconciliation, tokenized-asset compliance, finality audit, TCO calculation, and settlement verification into a single guided session.
Automated: ▶ Run the Stablecoin Compliance (GENIUS Act / MiCA) Composer: starts from a CBDC architecture comparison as its reserve-model input.
Automated: ▶ Run the Stablecoin Issuer GENIUS + MiCA Composer: runs a reserve optimizer as its lead step.
Automated: ▶ Run the GENIUS Act / MiCA Reserve Compliance Composer: chains reserve optimization, smart-contract validation, and an RWA tokenization cost model into a single guided session.
Automated: ▶ Run the Tokenization Prep Composer: chains ISCC content fingerprinting, AI-training rights reservation, royalty split validation, attribution strings, and a certified license election into a single guided session.
Begin with platform selection and privacy architecture before writing a single line of chaincode. Score Corda, Fabric, Besu, and Canton across use case dimensions, then confirm your privacy model.
Configure node count, consensus type, and geographic regions. Generate an SVG topology diagram, run a quorum health check, and flag single points of failure before provisioning infrastructure.
Check smart contract parameters against platform constraints and validate chain configuration files (configtx.yaml, genesis.json, network-parameters) against production best practices. Air-gapped validation.
Compare finality guarantees across target settlement rails, model DvP matching for tokenized asset settlement, and verify settlement state transitions from Corda or Canton output.
Stress-test stablecoin reserve peg health under redemption pressure, simulate network partitions and Byzantine fault scenarios, and synthesise all prior decisions into a structured Architecture Decision Record and board-ready governance memo.
Compare CBDC architectural choices across three canonical design axes: distribution model, claim type, and access scope. Map to live jurisdictional implementations. Client-side. Zero PII.
Open ToolModel atomic settlement, PvP, and failure scenarios between mBridge, Digital Euro, Project Dunbar, SAMA/CBUAE, Corda, Canton, and Besu platforms. Template-driven scenario narrative and AP2 audit artifact. Client-side. Zero PII.
Open ToolClient-side static analysis for Corda CorDapp and Hyperledger Fabric chaincode. Rule-based validation of settlement finality conditions, obligation logic, endorsement policies, and counterparty clauses. Air-gapped. Zero PII.
Open ToolClient-side audit of Hyperledger Fabric configtx.yaml and Besu genesis.json. Checks endorsement policy completeness, MSP cert windows, Raft/QBFT quorum, PDC scoping, and Tessera deprecation status. Air-gapped. Zero PII.
Open ToolInput spend caps, counterparty allowlists, settlement windows, escalation triggers, and N-of-M approval requirements. Outputs Policy Mandate JSON, Solidity stub (Besu), Kotlin CorDapp stub (Corda), and SVG approval workflow DAG. Zero PII.
Open ToolThree-pass delivery-versus-payment reconciliation for tokenized asset settlement. Match on-chain transfer events against off-chain cash ledger. Flags exceptions: delivered without payment, paid without delivery, timing mismatch, and amount mismatch. Client-side. Zero PII.
Open ToolStatic reference mapping from ISO 20022 message fields (pain.001, pacs.008, pacs.004, camt.053, camt.056) to DLT parameters on Corda, Fabric, and Besu. Highlights interoperability gaps and generates translation stub code. Client-side. Zero PII.
Open ToolEnterprise Hyperledger Fabric settlement verifier. Paste peer channel fetch output (block/transaction JSON) to browse blocks, view transaction detail, inspect chaincode invocation history, and decode channel config. Air-gapped. Zero PII.
Open ToolCompare operational vs. legal finality timelines across RTGS, real-time, and tokenized payment rails. Counterparty exposure window calculator covering Fedwire, TARGET2, FedNow, RTP, Fnality, mBridge, and more.
Open ToolPaste Corda or Canton settlement transaction JSON to decode state machine transitions, verify WebCrypto signatures, map ISO 20022 fields, and verify iso20022Hash (keccak256 vs SHA-256). Pass/fail report with Policy Mandate. Client-side. Zero PII.
Open ToolVisualize Hyperledger Fabric PDC topology and Canton sub-transaction privacy models. Parse configtx.yaml PDC definitions or Canton party-to-participant mapping to produce a color-coded visibility heatmap. Client-side. Zero PII.
Open ToolStatic reference comparison of Hyperledger Fabric, Hyperledger Besu, R3 Corda, and Digital Asset Canton across 10 enterprise dimensions. Client-side platform narrative generation. Includes Contour failure case study. Last reviewed: May 2026.
Open ToolDecision-tree questionnaire (10 questions) recommending the optimal DLT privacy model: Fabric PDC, Fabric channels, Corda confidential transactions, Canton sub-transaction privacy, or Besu private transaction manager. Client-side. Zero PII.
Open ToolInteractive SVG node topology for permissioned DLT networks. Configure platform, node count, consensus type, and regions to generate a visual architecture diagram with quorum health check, single-point-of-failure flags, and a board-ready architecture brief.
Open ToolStatic analysis of ERC-3643 (T-REX) and ERC-1400 token contract metadata JSON. Checks identityRegistry, compliance contract, claimTopic list, forced transfer, recovery address, partition restrictions, and jurisdictional compliance matrix (ESMA/SEC/SAMA/MAS). Client-side. Zero PII.
Open Tool5-year TCO model for tokenizing real-world assets vs. traditional settlement. Compare bond, MMF, repo, and trade receivable tokenization costs across Corda, Canton, Fabric, and public EVM. Break-even analysis. Client-side. Zero PII.
Open Tool3-year total cost of ownership comparison across Hyperledger Fabric, Hyperledger Besu, R3 Corda, and Digital Asset Canton. Infrastructure, developer, and support cost modelling. Client-side. Zero PII.
Open ToolClient-side stablecoin reserve composition analyzer and peg stress testing engine. Model reserve health for USDT, USDC, DAI, PYUSD, FDUSD, and EURC: or configure custom reserve structures. Stress-test peg stability under devaluation shocks, liquidity crunches, and bank-run redemption scenarios. Calculates collateralization ratios, liquidity coverage, redemption waterfall sequencing, and time-to-peg-recovery. Regulatory compliance mapping across MiCA, US GENIUS Act, SAMA, CBUAE, and MAS.
Open Tool5-step wizard generating a governance, finality, operational, and regulatory readiness checklist for enterprise DLT deployment. Select jurisdiction, network type, and asset class. Export Markdown report. Client-side. Zero PII.
Open ToolThe synthesis layer for the entire Cat-11 suite. Input your platform selection, privacy topology, node architecture, contract parameters, and settlement model: and the Decision Lab generates a structured Architecture Decision Record (ADR), a board-ready governance memo, and an executive summary of trade-offs across Corda, Fabric, Besu, and Canton. The final output of every DLT deployment journey. Client-side. Zero PII.
Open ToolSimulate network partitions and Byzantine fault scenarios across Hyperledger Fabric (Raft), Besu (QBFT), R3 Corda, and Canton. Configure your node topology and partition event: the tool generates a platform-specific numbered recovery runbook, transaction re-verification manifest, and governance voting worksheet. Client-side. Zero PII.
Open ToolOptimize stablecoin reserve composition under the US GENIUS Act requirements. Models permitted reserve asset classes, concentration limits, liquidity buffers, and yield-to-compliance trade-offs.
Open ToolLast reviewed: May 2026 · tools · Cat-11 · DLT & Tokenization
Use T68 and T70 to generate a visual topology and quorum health report before writing chaincode. Validate smart contract parameters and chain config against production standards with T54 and T56.
Compare CBDC platform architectures (T53), model multi-ledger interoperability scenarios (T58), and stress-test stablecoin reserve peg health under redemption pressure (T75): all without uploading sensitive programme data to a third-party server.
Run the Tokenized Asset Compliance Pre-Checker (T63) against ERC-3643 and ERC-1400 requirements, model RWA tokenization costs (T66), and generate a full TCO comparison (T67) before committing to a platform.
Use the DvP Reconciliation Engine (T55) to model delivery-versus-payment matching, audit cross-rail finality windows (T65), and verify settlement state transitions with the DLT Settlement Verifier (T74).
Tools in this hub are mapped to obligations under the following frameworks. Verify current applicability with qualified legal counsel.
EU comprehensive crypto-asset regulatory framework covering issuers of asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens, CASPs, and stablecoin reserve requirements. Relevant to T75 and T63.
Federal framework for payment stablecoin issuance. Defines reserve composition, redemption rights, and issuer capital requirements relevant to stablecoin reserve stress-testing tooling (T75).
BIS concept for shared programmable financial infrastructure connecting tokenized commercial bank money, wholesale CBDC, and tokenized assets. Foundational reference for CBDC interoperability modeling (T53, T58).
SAMA and CBUAE virtual asset regulatory frameworks aligned with FATF guidelines, covering licensing for digital asset service providers, stablecoin issuance, and live CBDC pilot programmes.
FATF Recommendation 16 requirement that originator and beneficiary information accompany virtual asset transfers above the threshold. Relevant to cross-chain settlement finality auditing (T65) and T63.
EU Instant Payments Regulation mandating euro instant payments at parity pricing from 2025. Intersects with DLT settlement finality tooling for tokenized payment systems where euro settlement rails underpin on-chain DvP workflows.
Open T68: Enterprise DLT Platform Comparator and configure your use case. The comparator scores Corda, Fabric, Besu, and Canton across throughput, privacy model, finality type, and regulatory posture. Then open T69: DLT Privacy Model Selector to confirm the privacy architecture.
Open T70: Node Role & Trust Boundary Modeler and configure node count, consensus type, and geographic regions. The tool renders an SVG topology diagram, runs a quorum health check, and flags single points of failure before you provision infrastructure.
Open T54: Smart Contract Parameter Validator to check your contract parameters against platform constraints. Open T56: Permissioned Chain Config Auditor to validate your configtx.yaml (Fabric), network-parameters (Corda), or genesis.json (Besu) against production best practices.
Open T65: Cross-Rail Settlement Finality Auditor to compare finality guarantees across your target settlement rails. If your deployment includes tokenized asset settlement, open T55: DvP Reconciliation Engine to model delivery-versus-payment matching and detect reconciliation gaps before go-live.
Open T75: Stablecoin Reserve & Peg Health Auditor if your deployment involves stablecoin settlement or reserve management. Then open T73: Enterprise DLT Decision Lab to synthesize all prior decisions into a structured Architecture Decision Record and board-ready governance memo.
All tools expose structured outputs compatible with the AINumbers MCP manifest. Use the tool IDs below with any MCP-capable agent.
| Tool ID | MCP Name | Input Schema | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| T53 | CBDC Architecture Comparator | design_axes[], jurisdiction | architecture_comparison, recommendations |
| T54 | Smart Contract Parameter Validator | platform, contract_params{} | validation_results[], anomalies[], pass_fail |
| T55 | DvP Reconciliation Engine | on_chain_events[], off_chain_ledger[] | matched[], exceptions[], reconciliation_report |
| T56 | Permissioned Chain Config Auditor | platform, config_json{} | audit_results[], quorum_check, deprecation_flags[] |
| T57 | ISO 20022 ↔ DLT Flow Mapper | message_type, dlt_platform | field_mapping[], gaps[], stub_code |
| T58 | CBDC Interop Scenario Modeler | platforms[], scenario_type | scenario_narrative, failure_modes[], ap2_artifact |
| T59 | Fabric Ops Console | block_json{} | block_detail, tx_history[], channel_config |
| T63 | Tokenized Asset Compliance Pre-Checker | token_metadata_json{}, jurisdictions[] | compliance_check[], gaps[], jurisdiction_matrix |
| T64 | Chain Privacy Topology Visualizer | pdc_config{}, platform | heatmap_svg, visibility_matrix[], topology_report |
| T65 | Cross-Rail Settlement Finality Auditor | rails[], counterparty_exposure | finality_timelines[], exposure_window, comparison |
| T66 | RWA Tokenization Cost Model | asset_class, platforms[], volume | tco_5yr[], break_even, cost_comparison |
| T67 | DLT Platform TCO Calculator | platforms[], infra_params{} | tco_3yr[], cost_breakdown[], recommendation |
| T68 | Enterprise DLT Platform Comparator | use_case, dimensions[] | scores{}, narrative, case_study |
| T69 | DLT Privacy Model Selector | questionnaire_responses{} | recommended_model, rationale, alternatives[] |
| T70 | Node Role & Trust Boundary Modeler | platform, node_count, consensus, regions[] | topology_svg, quorum_health, spof_flags[], brief |
| T71 | DLT Smart Contract Guardrail Builder | spend_cap, allowlists[], approval_threshold | policy_mandate_json, solidity_stub, kotlin_stub, dag_svg |
| T72 | Governance, Finality & Operational Readiness Checklist | jurisdiction, network_type, asset_class | readiness_checklist[], markdown_report |
| T73 | Enterprise DLT Decision Lab | platform_selection{}, privacy_topology{}, settlement_model{} | adr{}, board_memo, executive_summary, policy_mandate_json |
| T74 | DLT Settlement Verifier | settlement_tx_json{}, platform | state_transitions[], sig_verification, pass_fail, policy_mandate |
| T75 | Stablecoin Reserve & Peg Health Auditor | stablecoin, reserve_config{}, stress_scenarios[] | collateralization_ratio, liquidity_coverage, peg_recovery_time, ap2_csv |
| T108 | DLT Consensus Partition & Recovery Simulator | platform, node_topology{}, partition_event{} | recovery_runbook[], recheck_manifest, governance_worksheet |
Part of the web3 hub family: the full directory lives at web3-hub.html.