Model Tempo's enshrined-AMM gas cost paid in any major stablecoin plus server-paid fee sponsorship, vs card/SWIFT/ACH baselines. Distinct from Arc Paymaster: Tempo has no native gas token and uses an enshrined AMM, not ERC-4337.
model_tempo_payment_economics{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "model_tempo_payment_economics",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
model_tempo_gas_economics{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "model_tempo_gas_economics",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: If we sponsor gas on every payment, at what monthly volume does sponsorship stop paying for itself?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"tempo-gas-economics"} and read `art-107-tempo-gas-economics.sponsorship_breakeven_tx`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `art-107-tempo-gas-economics`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `server_paid_pct` set to 100. Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/tempo-gas-economics.html