Reconcile executed MPP recurring/streamed draws against the authorized mandate envelope, prove draw-set integrity, and aggregate receipts.
decode_mpp_session{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "decode_mpp_session",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
reconcile_mpp_subscription{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "reconcile_mpp_subscription",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
verify_merkle_batch{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "verify_merkle_batch",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
aggregate_execution_receipts{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "aggregate_execution_receipts",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: A subscription agent drew three monthly payments against its granted envelope. Did every draw stay inside the per-cycle and total caps?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"tempo-subscription-settlement"} and read `art-106-tempo-subscription-reconciler.verdict`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `art-106-tempo-subscription-reconciler`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `envelope` changed so cap_per_cycle is 80 instead of 100. Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/tempo-subscription-settlement.html