Verify a paycheck's garnishment withholding in three recompute stages: first compute federal income tax withholding by the IRS Publication 15-T percentage method for the declared tax year edition (ART-338), then compute gross-to-net pay with FICA at that year's Social Security wage base (ART-339), then recompute how much of the employee's disposable earnings each order in a caller-declared garnishment stack may lawfully withhold under the CCPA Title III caps, compared against a garnishment notice where one is supplied (ART-572), closing with a session receipt aggregating the run's execution hashes (CRY-05). Wage, filing, deduction, and order figures are caller-supplied inputs; each stage is an independent recompute from its own declared inputs. A mismatch is an arithmetic finding, never a legal determination about an order's validity. Not legal advice and not tax advice.
Note: all wage, filing, deduction, and garnishment order figures are caller-supplied inputs, never inferred by the kernels. tax_year selects the Publication 15-T edition and the FICA wage base; an unsupported year fails closed rather than defaulting. A mismatch is an arithmetic finding, not a legal determination about the validity of a garnishment order.
compute_federal_withholding{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "compute_federal_withholding",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
compute_gross_to_net{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "compute_gross_to_net",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
recompute_garnishment_stack{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "recompute_garnishment_stack",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
aggregate_execution_receipts{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "aggregate_execution_receipts",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: Two garnishment orders hit the same paycheck. After federal withholding and FICA, how much can each order lawfully take under the CCPA caps?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"garnishment-withholding-check"} and read `art-572-multi-garnishment-stacking-recompute.verdict`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `art-572-multi-garnishment-stacking-recompute`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `gross_minor_units` set to 120000. Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/garnishment-withholding-check.html