Binds one agent-run transaction across three independent agentic-commerce layers into a single hash-anchored composite: UCP cart/checkout discovery, ACP checkout conformance, and the AP2 payment mandate. UCP composes with AP2 rather than competing with it (Google developer blog); this chain evidences that composition as one dated receipt. Each step keeps its own verdict scope, never merged into a single cross-layer determination.
lint_ucp_checkout_payload{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "lint_ucp_checkout_payload",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
validate_acp_checkout{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "validate_acp_checkout",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
validate_ap2_mandate_chain{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "validate_ap2_mandate_chain",
"arguments": {}
},
"id": 1
}
Copy this paragraph into Claude, OpenClaw, or any MCP-aware agent to run this whole workflow on the server and check one field that answers a real question.
Question: We lint one checkout payload across UCP and ACP. What happens to the UCP verdict when the totals block goes missing?
Run the AINumbers MCP tool `run_chain` with {"chain":"agentic-commerce-convergence"} and read `art-564-ucp-checkout-payload-lint.verdict`.
Re-run with `inputs` for `art-564-ucp-checkout-payload-lint`, reusing the values that result echoed, with `payload` changed so its totals block is missing. Compare the same field.
Verify: call `verify_execution_hash` (https://mcp.ainumbers.co/mcp) with `claimed_hash` set to `composite_execution_hash` and the full `composite_artifact`.
Ledger, for a human re-check: https://ledger.ainumbers.co/
PII rule: send synthetic or anonymised inputs only. The MCP server runs these kernels and logs no payloads.
Chain page: https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/chains/agentic-commerce-convergence.html