Scenario Guide · DORA & Operational Resilience

Your DORA
Compliance Journey

DORA (EU Regulation 2022/2554) has been in force since 17 January 2025. Where you start depends on where you are — a live incident, a board-level gap review, or an upcoming NCA supervisory engagement each require a different sequence through the regulation's obligations. Pick your scenario below.

⚠ DORA enforcement active since 17 Jan 2025 · Applies to ~22,000 financial entities and ICT third-party providers across the EU
4 Tools · 3 Scenarios DORA Art. 17–23 · Art. 26–28 · Art. 30 Client-side · Zero PII ~50 min end-to-end
⚙ Where are you starting from?

Each scenario runs the same four-tool structure — proportionality scoping first, AP2 mandate export last — with the two middle steps tailored to your immediate need.

01
T307
Common to all scenarios Start here

DORA Proportionality Assessment Tool

Before any DORA compliance work — whether you're in an incident or preparing for a board review — you need to establish your entity's proportionality tier. DORA's obligations scale with the systemic importance, size, and risk profile of the financial entity. This tool maps your entity profile to the three proportionality tiers, identifies which ICT risk management articles apply in full vs simplified form, and flags any exemptions. This scoping output drives everything in Steps 2 and 3.

↳ Inputs
Entity type (credit institution, investment firm, payment institution, etc.). Total assets. Number of ICT third-party providers. Cross-border activity. Whether you are a microenterprise.
→ Outputs
Proportionality tier (full / simplified / microenterprise). Applicable DORA articles list. Simplified ICT risk management eligibility. Drives Steps 2–3 scope.
Open T307
02
RBE-11
Scenario A

DORA ICT Incident Classification & Reporting Engine

Classify the incident against DORA Article 17 criteria — availability, authenticity, integrity, confidentiality impacts — and determine whether it crosses the major incident threshold requiring NCA notification. The engine applies the RTS on incident classification (JC 2023 83) to produce a severity determination, initial notification deadline (within 4 hours of major incident detection), intermediate report deadline (within 72 hours), and final report deadline (within 1 month). Outputs feed directly into Step 3.

↳ Inputs
Incident type. Affected services and data. Number of clients impacted. Duration. Geographic spread. Financial loss estimate. Whether it triggered business continuity measures.
→ Outputs
Major/non-major determination. Severity score. NCA notification requirement. Reporting timeline (4h / 72h / 1-month). Classification rationale. Feeds Step 3.
Open RBE-11
03
T308
Scenario A

DORA NCA Submission & Deadline Tracker

Once severity is determined in Step 2, this tool maps the full NCA reporting obligation — which national competent authority to notify, which reporting template applies (per ESMA/EBA/EIOPA joint ITS), and the exact deadlines for initial notification, intermediate report, and final report. It also tracks voluntary notification requirements for significant cyber threats under Article 19 and generates a submission checklist keyed to your entity type and primary NCA.

↳ Inputs
Major incident classification from Step 2. Entity type and member state. Primary NCA. Whether Article 19 cyber threat notification applies.
→ Outputs
NCA identity and submission channel. Reporting template reference. Deadline calendar (initial / intermediate / final). Submission checklist. Ready for Step 4 mandate export.
Open T308
04
T310
Common to all scenarios Export & mandate

AP2 DORA Policy Mandate Builder

Consolidate the outputs from Steps 1–3 into a validated AP2 Policy Mandate — a structured JSON document that captures your DORA compliance posture, incident response configuration, or gap remediation plan in a machine-readable format. The mandate includes an agent_instructions array that is directly ingestible by MCP agent runtimes, enabling automated compliance monitoring and policy enforcement downstream. Built-in contradiction detection flags any policy conflicts before export.

↳ Inputs
Proportionality tier from Step 1. Incident / gap / supervisory findings from Steps 2–3. Entity risk appetite. Board-approved policy parameters. NCA identity.
→ Outputs
Validated AP2 DORA Policy Mandate JSON. Human-readable policy summary. MCP agent_instructions array. Contradiction detection report. Board-ready compliance record.
Open T310
✓ What you now have

A documented incident response chain with NCA reporting artefacts

After running this chain you will have: a proportionality tier determination confirming your DORA scope (T307), a major/non-major incident classification with severity scoring and reporting timeline (RBE-11), a complete NCA submission checklist with deadlines and template references (T308), and a validated AP2 DORA Policy Mandate capturing the full incident response posture (T310).

The AP2 mandate JSON from T310 includes an agent_instructions array that can be ingested by an MCP agent runtime for automated ongoing compliance monitoring — turning a one-off incident response into a persistent policy enforcement layer.