{
  "tool_id": "art-528-cross-ccp-pqd-comparator",
  "kernel_id": "art-528-cross-ccp-pqd-comparator",
  "display_name": "Cross-CCP PQD Comparator",
  "tool_version": "1.0.0",
  "mandate_type": "regulatory_reporting",
  "purpose": "Compares a caller-selected set of CPMI-IOSCO public quantitative disclosure (PQD) fields across FICC and ICE using a manually-transcribed, source-cited fixture dataset -- backtest coverage and largest margin deficiency per FICC division (GSD, MBSD, NSCC), and default fund requirement, Cover-2 peak stress loss, and total initial margin required per ICE clearing house (ICC, ICEU, ICUS), plus a CCP-level ICE skin-in-the-game total. FICC and ICE do not disclose the same field set; a field one side does not publish is reported unavailable, never interpolated. Flags a caller-declared threshold breach (e.g. Cover-2 peak stress loss exceeding a declared percentage of default fund requirement) per entity. Comparison arithmetic and delta table only -- no ranking, no better/worse scoring language, no forecasting. CME and LCH are named in the spec but not built -- selecting either yields an unknown-CCP rejection, never a fabricated figure. Every fixture figure is public and source-cited to the CCP's own quarterly disclosure PDF, refreshed manually per quarter, never a live feed and never scraped.",
  "control_description": "Compares a caller-selected set of CPMI-IOSCO public quantitative disclosure (PQD) fields across FICC and ICE using a manually-transcribed, source-cited fixture dataset -- backtest coverage and largest margin deficiency per FICC division (GSD, MBSD, NSCC), and default fund requirement, Cover-2 peak stress loss, and total initial margin required per ICE clearing house (ICC, ICEU, ICUS), plus a CCP-level ICE skin-in-the-game total. FICC and ICE do not disclose the same field set; a field one side does not publish is reported unavailable, never interpolated. Flags a caller-declared threshold breach (e.g. Cover-2 peak stress loss exceeding a declared percentage of default fund requirement) per entity. Comparison arithmetic and delta table only -- no ranking, no better/worse scoring language, no forecasting. CME and LCH are named in the spec but not built -- selecting either yields an unknown-CCP rejection, never a fabricated figure. Every fixture figure is public and source-cited to the CCP's own quarterly disclosure PDF, refreshed manually per quarter, never a live feed and never scraped.",
  "declared_inputs": [],
  "declared_outputs": [],
  "kernel_digest": "sha256:fd251101f928b941bade8919f9fc8215154f87e82c9ec9e6953ea483c95b82f1",
  "trust_label": "independently verified: zkVM execution proof (risc0/groth16-bn254)",
  "data_vintage": "2026-08-04",
  "last_validated": "2026-08-04",
  "conformance_fixtures_vendored": true,
  "compute_proof_ready": "ready",
  "wave": 82,
  "source_url": "https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/art-528-cross-ccp-pqd-comparator.html",
  "generated_at": "2026-08-15T11:12:17.704Z"
}