{
  "tool_id": "art-354-mletr-jurisdiction-adoption-lookup",
  "kernel_id": "art-354-mletr-jurisdiction-adoption-lookup",
  "display_name": "MLETR Jurisdiction-Adoption Lookup",
  "tool_version": "1.0.0",
  "mandate_type": "compliance_mandate",
  "purpose": "Static citation-table lookup of UNCITRAL MLETR (Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records) adoption status per jurisdiction -- statute, scope, and effective date, data_version stamped -- and a corridor verdict for whether an electronic bill of lading (eBL) is legally effective end-to-end between an origin and destination jurisdiction (UK, Singapore, UAE, Bahrain, France, Japan, India, US, Germany at this data_version). Answers the 'is an eBL legally effective in corridor X->Y' practitioner question that sits upstream of the MLETR control-evidence chain (art-352/art-353).",
  "control_description": "Static citation-table lookup of UNCITRAL MLETR (Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records) adoption status per jurisdiction -- statute, scope, and effective date, data_version stamped -- and a corridor verdict for whether an electronic bill of lading (eBL) is legally effective end-to-end between an origin and destination jurisdiction (UK, Singapore, UAE, Bahrain, France, Japan, India, US, Germany at this data_version). Answers the 'is an eBL legally effective in corridor X->Y' practitioner question that sits upstream of the MLETR control-evidence chain (art-352/art-353).",
  "declared_inputs": [],
  "declared_outputs": [],
  "kernel_digest": "sha256:182b05c2f8ecd1a36f271bfffc299baad5f581b051bf9b4f921e9e9521599ab7",
  "trust_label": "independently verified: zkVM execution proof (risc0/groth16-bn254)",
  "data_vintage": "2026-07-10",
  "last_validated": "2026-07-10",
  "conformance_fixtures_vendored": true,
  "compute_proof_ready": "ready",
  "wave": 47,
  "source_url": "https://ainumbers.co/chaingraph/art-354-mletr-jurisdiction-adoption-lookup.html",
  "generated_at": "2026-08-15T11:12:17.704Z"
}